Srinagar: The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), after examining recent reports and social media claims concerning egg safety, has stated that eggs sold in India comply with existing food safety regulations and that no violation has been established on the basis of the findings cited.
According to The Hindu, the issue arose from claims alleging the presence of nitrofuran metabolites, including AOZ, in eggs. FSSAI noted that the use of nitrofurans is strictly prohibited at all stages of poultry and egg production under the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011.
The authority clarified that an Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (EMRL) of 1.0 microgram per kilogram has been prescribed for nitrofuran metabolites solely for regulatory and enforcement purposes. Detection of residues below this limit does not amount to a food safety violation and does not indicate any health risk to consumers. An official told National Herald that EMRLs are intended as monitoring tools to aid enforcement and should not be misconstrued as safety thresholds.
FSSAI further stated that India’s regulatory framework is aligned with international practices. The European Union and the United States also prohibit the use of nitrofurans in food-producing animals and rely on reference points for enforcement rather than risk-based consumption limits. Differences in numerical values across jurisdictions, the authority said, reflect variations in regulatory and analytical approaches, not differences in consumer safety standards.
Addressing references to particular egg brands in some reports, FSSAI said these were based on isolated, batch-specific laboratory detections, often attributed to inadvertent contamination or feed-related factors. Such findings, it concluded, cannot be generalised to draw conclusions about the overall safety of eggs available in the market.
FSSAI urged that conclusions on food safety be drawn from comprehensive scientific assessment and regulatory context, and cautioned against interpreting selective laboratory data in a manner that could mislead the public.
