Saturday, September 5, 2026
The Kashmir Glory
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
No Result
View All Result
The Kashmir Glory
No Result
View All Result

Government Cannot Keep Ad Hoc Employees Waiting for Regularisation at Its “Whims and Caprice”: J&K High Court Full Bench

KG News Desk by KG News Desk
September 5, 2026
in Legal
0
Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

READ ALSO

‘Liberty Once Granted Cannot Be Lightly Interfered With’: J&K High Court Upholds Bail Granted to Rape Accused

High Speed Alone Does Not Prove Rash or Negligent Driving: Delhi High Court

Jammu, September 4: The Full Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that an eligible ad hoc, contractual or consolidated government employee acquires a statutory right to regularisation upon fulfilling the conditions prescribed under Section 5 of the J&K Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010.

The significant ruling came while the Full Bench considered conflicting judgments of different Division Benches concerning the effective date of regularisation of employees appointed on ad hoc, contractual or consolidated basis.

The dispute before the court centred on whether regularisation should take effect from the date on which an employee becomes eligible, after 150 days from such eligibility, or only from the date on which the Government formally issues an order granting regularisation.

The Full Bench, comprising Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Justice Sanjay Dhar and Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani, examined the statutory scheme governing regularisation and clarified the legal position on the issue.

The court observed that once an employee satisfies the statutory requirements for regularisation, the right arising under the law cannot be left entirely to the discretion or convenience of the Government.

The Full Bench made it clear that the Government cannot keep an otherwise eligible employee waiting indefinitely for issuance of a formal regularisation order or choose the effective date of regularisation according to its own convenience.

In substance, the court held that the statutory right of an eligible employee cannot be defeated merely because the competent authority delays the issuance of the formal order.

The judgment assumes importance for a large number of employees engaged under ad hoc, contractual and consolidated arrangements, particularly those who have completed the prescribed period of service and fulfilled the conditions laid down under the 2010 Act.

The Full Bench’s ruling also seeks to settle the conflicting interpretations that had emerged in earlier Division Bench decisions regarding the point from which regularisation would become effective.

The court’s observations reinforce the principle that executive delay cannot deprive an employee of a statutory benefit once the employee has fulfilled all conditions prescribed by law.

The judgment is expected to have wider implications for cases involving claims for regularisation and consequential service benefits where employees have already become eligible under the statutory framework but formal Government orders were issued at a later stage.

The ruling thus provides important clarity on the rights of eligible ad hoc, contractual and consolidated employees and places limits on the discretion of the Government in determining when their regularisation should take effect.

The judgment is likely to serve as an important reference in pending and future service matters concerning regularisation under the J&K Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010.(KNC)

Share this:

  • Post
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related Posts

Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Legal

‘Liberty Once Granted Cannot Be Lightly Interfered With’: J&K High Court Upholds Bail Granted to Rape Accused

September 4, 2026
Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizb Operative in Anantnag
Legal

High Speed Alone Does Not Prove Rash or Negligent Driving: Delhi High Court

September 4, 2026
HC refuses to entertain PIL to remove graves of Afzal Guru, Maqbool Bhatt from Tihar Jail premises
Legal

Delhi HC grants bail to two persons in J-K terror case citing prolonged incarceration

September 3, 2026
Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizb Operative in Anantnag
Legal

J&K High Court Upholds PSA Detention of Man Accused in 2017 DySP Lynching Case

September 2, 2026
Internet Restrictions In J&K: Review Orders Not Meant To Be Kept In Cupboard, Says SC
Legal

SC Collegium Recommends Elevation Of Judges As Chief Justices; Justice Dr Pushpendra Singh Recommended As CJ Of J&K And Ladakh High Court

September 1, 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Case Against Kashmir Professor for Article 370 Post
Legal

Punishing Students for Asking Questions Is Unconstitutional: SC Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

August 30, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed By Window Technolgies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • National
  • International
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Sports
  • Top Stories
  • E-Paper

Designed By Window Technolgies

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
%d