Sunday, May 24, 2026
The Kashmir Glory
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
No Result
View All Result
The Kashmir Glory
No Result
View All Result

J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention, Orders Release of Detained Youth

KG News Desk by KG News Desk
March 13, 2026
in Kashmir, Legal
0
Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

READ ALSO

Two Carpenters Injured After Falling From Rooftop in Srinagar

Man Found Unconscious, Declared Dead at SMHS Hospital

Srinagar, March 13: The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has quashed the preventive detention of a Pulwama resident under the Public Safety Act (PSA), declaring the detention illegal and directing authorities to release him immediately.

The court set aside the detention order issued by the District Magistrate Pulwama against Mudasir Ahmad Bhat, observing serious discrepancies and lack of proper application of mind in the handling of the case.

Justice Rahul Bharti delivered the judgment while hearing a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of the detainee challenging the legality of the preventive detention order.

The petitioner had approached the court through his wife, seeking quashing of the detention order issued under Section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978.

According to the case record, the detention order No. 12/DMP/PSA/25 dated April 30, 2025 had been issued by the District Magistrate Pulwama following a dossier submitted by the Senior Superintendent of Police Pulwama alleging that the petitioner was involved in activities prejudicial to the security of the state.

Police had alleged that the petitioner was acting as an overground worker and was providing logistical support to militants and sharing information regarding the movement of security forces.

The authorities had also claimed that he was attempting to influence local youth and encourage them to join militant ranks.

Based on these allegations, the District Magistrate ordered his preventive detention and the detainee was lodged in District Jail Udhampur.

The detention order was subsequently approved by the Jammu and Kashmir government and extended for a period of six months.

However, during the hearing, the court found multiple inconsistencies in the official records and documents presented by the authorities.

Justice Bharti observed that there were discrepancies between the police dossier and the grounds of detention prepared by the District Magistrate, including conflicting dates related to police summons issued to the petitioner.

The court also noted that the jail authorities had reported that the detainee had been lodged in District Jail Udhampur since December 5, 2024, even though the detention order was issued later on April 30, 2025.

The court described the situation as disturbing and indicative of a lack of proper attention by officials handling preventive detention matters.

“The preventive detention inflicted upon the petitioner is painful and pinching to the very constitutional sensitivity with which preventive detention jurisdiction is supposed to be exercised,” the court observed.

The judgment further stated that such serious errors in official records reflect carelessness in the handling of preventive detention cases by the concerned authorities.

In view of the inconsistencies and procedural lapses, the court declared the detention illegal and quashed the order issued by the District Magistrate Pulwama along with subsequent approval, confirmation and extension orders issued by the Home Department of the Union Territory.

The High Court directed the Superintendent District Jail Udhampur to restore the detainee to personal liberty immediately.

The petitioner was represented by advocates Zameer Abdullah and Zahir Abdullah, sons of Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, while the UT government was represented by Government Advocate Furqan Yaqoob.. [KNT]

Share this:

  • Post
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related Posts

Heating Appliance Mishap Leaves 2 CRPF Personnel With Burn Injuries
Kashmir

Two Carpenters Injured After Falling From Rooftop in Srinagar

May 23, 2026
Srinagar Student Dies of Heart Attack in Punjab, AIMSA Appeals for Repatriation
Kashmir

Man Found Unconscious, Declared Dead at SMHS Hospital

May 23, 2026
Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Jammu and Kashmir

J&K High Court Designates 15 Advocates as Senior Advocates

May 23, 2026
04 Peddlers Arrested, Contraband Substances Recovered
Kashmir

04 Peddlers Arrested, Contraband Substances Recovered

May 23, 2026
Mother-in-law of Imam Jama Masjid Srinagar passes away
Kashmir

Woman Dies After Wall Collapses in South Kashmir

May 23, 2026
CS reviews Transport Department performance; stresses safer roads, smarter enforcement
Kashmir

CS reviews Transport Department performance; stresses safer roads, smarter enforcement

May 23, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed By Window Technolgies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • National
  • International
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Sports
  • Top Stories
  • E-Paper

Designed By Window Technolgies

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
%d