Saturday, September 5, 2026
The Kashmir Glory
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • International
  • National
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Top Stories
No Result
View All Result
The Kashmir Glory
No Result
View All Result

‘“Maro Saale Ko” Remark Alone Cannot Establish Murder Intent’: Delhi High Court Acquits Man After 22-Year Appeal

KG News Desk by KG News Desk
June 20, 2026
in Legal
0
Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizb Operative in Anantnag
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

READ ALSO

Possession of separatist literature alone cannot justify PSA detention: J&K High Court

Government Cannot Keep Ad Hoc Employees Waiting for Regularisation at Its “Whims and Caprice”: J&K High Court Full Bench

New Delhi, June 20 : In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has held that merely uttering the words “Maro Saale Ko” cannot, by itself, be treated as sufficient evidence to establish a common intention to commit murder under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

A Division Bench comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Ravinder Dudeja acquitted Mukesh Kumar in a murder case dating back to 1983, observing that the expression “maro” does not necessarily mean “kill” and may also be interpreted as “beat” or “assault” depending on the circumstances.

The Court noted that the prosecution had failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Mukesh Kumar shared a common intention with the co-accused to commit murder. It further observed that there was no evidence showing that he was carrying any weapon, had prior knowledge about the knives allegedly used in the crime, or was part of any premeditated plan to kill the deceased.

While examining the case, the Bench emphasized that criminal liability under Section 34 IPC requires clear proof of a shared intention and active participation in the commission of the offence. Mere presence at the scene or the use of an ambiguous phrase, without supporting evidence, cannot automatically attract liability for murder.

Granting the benefit of doubt to the appellant, the High Court set aside Mukesh Kumar’s conviction and life sentence. The Court also took note of the extraordinary delay in the judicial process, observing that the appeal had remained pending for nearly 22 years before being finally adjudicated.

The judgment underscores the principle that guilt in criminal cases must be established through cogent and convincing evidence, and that courts cannot presume a murderous intent solely on the basis of a verbal exhortation unless supported by surrounding circumstances and material evidence.

The ruling is being viewed as an important reaffirmation of the legal requirement that common intention under Section 34 IPC must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and cannot rest on assumptions or isolated statements alone.(KNC)

Share this:

  • Post
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related Posts

Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Legal

Possession of separatist literature alone cannot justify PSA detention: J&K High Court

September 5, 2026
Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Legal

Government Cannot Keep Ad Hoc Employees Waiting for Regularisation at Its “Whims and Caprice”: J&K High Court Full Bench

September 5, 2026
Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Division Bench Puts Seniority Issue of Patwaris To Rest
Legal

‘Liberty Once Granted Cannot Be Lightly Interfered With’: J&K High Court Upholds Bail Granted to Rape Accused

September 4, 2026
Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizb Operative in Anantnag
Legal

High Speed Alone Does Not Prove Rash or Negligent Driving: Delhi High Court

September 4, 2026
HC refuses to entertain PIL to remove graves of Afzal Guru, Maqbool Bhatt from Tihar Jail premises
Legal

Delhi HC grants bail to two persons in J-K terror case citing prolonged incarceration

September 3, 2026
Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against Hizb Operative in Anantnag
Legal

J&K High Court Upholds PSA Detention of Man Accused in 2017 DySP Lynching Case

September 2, 2026
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Designed By Window Technolgies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • Srinagar City
  • National
  • International
  • Opinion & Editorial
  • Sports
  • Top Stories
  • E-Paper

Designed By Window Technolgies

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
%d